Choose Call of Juarez: Gunslinger
Choose Call of Juarez: Gunslinger if you want the Steam Leaderboards side of the pairing. On Steam, it's Steam Deck Verified, so handheld play works out of the box. 9,778 Steam reviews back the pick.
Call of Juarez: Gunslinger and TIME COWBOY both land in Action on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both are Action games on Steam. Call of Juarez: Gunslinger (2013) is 12 years older than TIME COWBOY (2025). TIME COWBOY is currently ~67% cheaper on Steam than Call of Juarez: Gunslinger (4.99 USD vs. 14.99 USD). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose Call of Juarez: Gunslinger if you want the Steam Leaderboards side of the pairing. On Steam, it's Steam Deck Verified, so handheld play works out of the box. 9,778 Steam reviews back the pick.
Choose TIME COWBOY if you want an Indie and Early Access game with Camera Comfort, Custom Volume Controls, and Stereo Sound. On Steam, it's currently about 67% cheaper on the Steam Store. TIME COWBOY launched in 2025.
Both Call of Juarez: Gunslinger and TIME COWBOY sit in Action on Steam, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
Call of Juarez: Gunslinger | TIME COWBOY | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2013 | 2025 |
| Genres | Action | Action, Indie, Early Access |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Deck Verified | Unrated |
| Price | 14.99 USD | 4.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 94.5% positive (9,778 reviews) | 3 reviews |
| Multiplayer | Single-player only | Single-player only |
| Developers | Techland | carlosfruitcup |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more