IMHO.

Planets Under Attack vs Battlezone: Combat Commander

Planets Under Attack and Battlezone: Combat Commander both land in Strategy on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both are Strategy games on Steam. Planets Under Attack (2012) is 6 years older than Battlezone: Combat Commander (2018). Battlezone: Combat Commander scores higher on Steam reviews (90.5% positive) than Planets Under Attack (54.4% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.

Which should you pick?

Choose Planets Under Attack

Choose Planets Under Attack if you want an Indie experience. Planets Under Attack launched in 2012.

Choose Battlezone: Combat Commander

Choose Battlezone: Combat Commander if you want an Action game with Shared/Split Screen PvP. On Steam, it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 90.5% positive across 666 reviews.

Both Planets Under Attack and Battlezone: Combat Commander sit in Strategy on Steam and both list Multi-player, Online PvP, and PvP, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.

Side-by-side comparison

Planets Under Attack vs Battlezone: Combat Commander — Steam metadata comparison
Planets Under Attack — Steam game coverPlanets Under AttackBattlezone: Combat Commander — Steam game coverBattlezone: Combat Commander
Released20122018
GenresStrategy, IndieAction, Strategy
PlatformsWindows, macOSWindows
Steam DeckDeck PlayableDeck Playable
Price11.99 USD3.79 USD
Steam reviews54.4% positive (147 reviews)90.5% positive (666 reviews)
MultiplayerMulti-player, Cross-Platform MultiplayerMulti-player, Cross-Platform Multiplayer
DevelopersTargem GamesBig Boat Interactive

Side by side

Planets Under Attack vs Battlezone: Combat Commander — FAQ

Which is better, Planets Under Attack or Battlezone: Combat Commander?
On Steam reviews Battlezone: Combat Commander scores higher (90.5% positive) than Planets Under Attack (54.4% positive). Both have enough reviews to trust the signal, so for players using reviews alone, Battlezone: Combat Commander is the safer pick. Genre fit still matters — check the side-by-side table for the categories each game lands in.
Should I play Planets Under Attack or Battlezone: Combat Commander first?
If you want chronology, Planets Under Attack (2012) came out before Battlezone: Combat Commander (2018). If neither is a sequel to the other, order doesn't really matter — start with whichever fits your current mood, since both share enough on Steam to make either a reasonable opener.
Are Planets Under Attack and Battlezone: Combat Commander similar?
They overlap on Strategy on Steam, so the catalogue groups them together — but "similar" depends on the specific mechanics. Use the genre + category rows above to decide whether the overlap matches what drew you to the one you've already played.
Planets Under Attack vs Battlezone: Combat Commander · imho.run