Choose Guild Wars: Eye of the North®
Choose Guild Wars: Eye of the North® if you want an Action experience. Guild Wars: Eye of the North® launched in 2010.
Guild Wars: Eye of the North® and Guild Wars 2® both land in Massively Multiplayer, RPG on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Massively Multiplayer, RPG on Steam. Guild Wars: Eye of the North® (2010) is 12 years older than Guild Wars 2® (2022). Guild Wars 2® is free; Guild Wars: Eye of the North® is paid (Price unknown). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose Guild Wars: Eye of the North® if you want an Action experience. Guild Wars: Eye of the North® launched in 2010.
Choose Guild Wars 2® if you want an Adventure and Free To Play game with Online PvP, Online Co-op, and PvP. On Steam, it's free to play, so the barrier to trying it is zero. 17,646 Steam reviews back the pick.
Both Guild Wars: Eye of the North® and Guild Wars 2® sit in Massively Multiplayer and RPG on Steam and both list Multi-player, MMO, and Co-op, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
Guild Wars: Eye of the North® | Guild Wars 2® | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2010 | 2022 |
| Genres | Action, Massively Multiplayer, RPG | Adventure, Massively Multiplayer, RPG, Free To Play |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Unrated | Deck Playable |
| Price | Price unknown | Free to play |
| Steam reviews | 2 reviews | 88.5% positive (17,646 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Multi-player, Co-op | Multi-player, Online Co-op, Co-op |
| Developers | ArenaNet® | ArenaNet® |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more