Choose Blockpocalypse
Choose Blockpocalypse if you want an Action, Casual, and Early Access experience. Blockpocalypse launched in 2016.
Blockpocalypse and Dyebreaker both land in Sports, Indie on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Sports, Indie on Steam. Blockpocalypse (2016) is 9 years older than Dyebreaker (2025). Dyebreaker is currently ~67% cheaper on Steam than Blockpocalypse (4.99 USD vs. 14.99 USD). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose Blockpocalypse if you want an Action, Casual, and Early Access experience. Blockpocalypse launched in 2016.
Choose Dyebreaker if you want the Color Alternatives, Camera Comfort, and Custom Volume Controls side of the pairing. On Steam, it's currently about 67% cheaper on the Steam Store. Dyebreaker launched in 2025.
Both Blockpocalypse and Dyebreaker sit in Sports and Indie on Steam and both list Multi-player, Shared/Split Screen, and Shared/Split Screen PvP, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
Blockpocalypse | Dyebreaker | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2016 | 2025 |
| Genres | Action, Sports, Indie, Casual, Early Access | Sports, Indie |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Unrated | Unrated |
| Price | 14.99 USD | 4.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 5 reviews | 100% positive (20 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Multi-player, Shared/Split Screen Co-op, Co-op | Multi-player, Shared/Split Screen Co-op, Co-op |
| Developers | dimeStudios | running jump |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more