IMHO.

SpellKnights vs TimeLost

SpellKnights and TimeLost both land in Action, Free To Play on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Action, Free To Play on Steam. SpellKnights (2016) is 9 years older than TimeLost (2025). TimeLost scores higher on Steam reviews (65.5% positive) than SpellKnights (48.3% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.

Side-by-side comparison

SpellKnights vs TimeLost — Steam metadata comparison
SpellKnights — Steam game coverSpellKnightsTimeLost — Steam game coverTimeLost
Released20162025
GenresAction, Free To Play, Early AccessAction, Massively Multiplayer, Free To Play
PlatformsWindowsWindows
Steam DeckDeck UnsupportedUnrated
PriceFree to playFree to play
Steam reviews48.3% positive (58 reviews)65.5% positive (55 reviews)
MultiplayerMulti-playerMulti-player, Online Co-op, Co-op
DevelopersMechanical BossAfterPrime Studio

Side by side

SpellKnights vs TimeLost — FAQ

Should I play SpellKnights or TimeLost first?
If you want chronology, SpellKnights (2016) came out before TimeLost (2025). If neither is a sequel to the other, order doesn't really matter — start with whichever fits your current mood, since both share enough on Steam to make either a reasonable opener.
Are SpellKnights and TimeLost similar?
They overlap on Action, Free To Play on Steam, so the catalogue groups them together — but "similar" depends on the specific mechanics. Use the genre + category rows above to decide whether the overlap matches what drew you to the one you've already played.
SpellKnights vs TimeLost — comparison & verdict · imho.run