Choose [the Sequence]
Choose [the Sequence] if it matches what drew you to this matchup. [the Sequence] launched in 2016.
[the Sequence] and the Sequence [2] both land in Indie on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both are Indie games on Steam. [the Sequence] (2016) is 5 years older than the Sequence [2] (2021). [the Sequence] scores higher on Steam reviews (88.7% positive) than the Sequence [2] (84.6% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose [the Sequence] if it matches what drew you to this matchup. [the Sequence] launched in 2016.
Choose the Sequence [2] if you want a Simulation and Casual experience. On Steam, it's the newer release (2021) and ships with the modern feature baseline. the Sequence [2] launched in 2021.
Both [the Sequence] and the Sequence [2] sit in Indie on Steam, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
[the Sequence] | the Sequence [2] | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Genres | Indie | Indie, Simulation, Casual |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Unrated | Deck Playable |
| Price | 4.99 USD | 4.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 88.7% positive (106 reviews) | 84.6% positive (13 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Single-player only | Single-player only |
| Developers | [OneManBand] | [OneManBand] |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more