Choose POLYCRUSHER
Choose POLYCRUSHER if it matches what drew you to this matchup. POLYCRUSHER launched in 2016.
POLYCRUSHER and Retromancer both land in Action, Indie on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Action, Indie on Steam. POLYCRUSHER (2016) is 3 years older than Retromancer (2019). Both support cooperative play. No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose POLYCRUSHER if it matches what drew you to this matchup. POLYCRUSHER launched in 2016.
Choose Retromancer if it's the newer release (2019) and ships with the modern feature baseline. Retromancer launched in 2019.
Both POLYCRUSHER and Retromancer sit in Action and Indie on Steam and both list Multi-player, Shared/Split Screen, and Steam Leaderboards, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
POLYCRUSHER | Retromancer | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2016 | 2019 |
| Genres | Action, Indie | Action, Indie |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, macOS |
| Steam Deck | Unrated | Unrated |
| Price | Price unknown | 2.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 7 reviews | 2 reviews |
| Multiplayer | Multi-player, Shared/Split Screen Co-op, Co-op | Multi-player, Shared/Split Screen Co-op, Co-op |
| Developers | Atomic Pond Studios | Spinfoam Games |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more