Choose FlatOut
Choose FlatOut if you want a Simulation game with Multi-player, LAN PvP, and PvP. On Steam, it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 90.9% positive across 1,583 reviews.
FlatOut and Danger Zone both land in Action, Racing on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Action, Racing on Steam. FlatOut (2007) is 10 years older than Danger Zone (2017). FlatOut scores higher on Steam reviews (90.9% positive) than Danger Zone (66.2% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose FlatOut if you want a Simulation game with Multi-player, LAN PvP, and PvP. On Steam, it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 90.9% positive across 1,583 reviews.
Choose Danger Zone if you want an Indie game with Steam Leaderboards. On Steam, it's the newer release (2017) and ships with the modern feature baseline. Danger Zone launched in 2017.
Both FlatOut and Danger Zone sit in Action and Racing on Steam, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
FlatOut | Danger Zone | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2007 | 2017 |
| Genres | Action, Simulation, Racing | Action, Indie, Racing |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Deck Verified | Deck Playable |
| Price | 7.49 USD | 14.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 90.9% positive (1,583 reviews) | 66.2% positive (130 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Multi-player | Single-player only |
| Developers | Bugbear Entertainment, ZOOM Platform Media, Jordan Freeman Group | Three Fields Entertainment |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more