Choose FIELD BREAKING
Choose FIELD BREAKING if you want an Early Access experience. FIELD BREAKING launched in 2017.
FIELD BREAKING and 液态围棋 both land in Strategy, Indie, Simulation on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Strategy, Indie, Simulation on Steam. FIELD BREAKING (2017) is 9 years older than 液态围棋 (2026). 液态围棋 is free; FIELD BREAKING is paid (3.99 USD). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose FIELD BREAKING if you want an Early Access experience. FIELD BREAKING launched in 2017.
Choose 液态围棋 if you want a Sports and Free To Play game with Shared/Split Screen and Shared/Split Screen PvP. On Steam, it's free to play, so the barrier to trying it is zero. 液态围棋 launched in 2026.
Both FIELD BREAKING and 液态围棋 sit in Strategy, Indie, and Simulation on Steam and both list Multi-player, Online PvP, and PvP, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
FIELD BREAKING | 液态围棋 | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2017 | 2026 |
| Genres | Strategy, Indie, Simulation, Casual, Early Access | Sports, Strategy, Indie, Simulation, Free To Play, Casual |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Unrated | Unrated |
| Price | 3.99 USD | Free to play |
| Steam reviews | 38.5% positive (13 reviews) | 1 reviews |
| Multiplayer | Multi-player | Multi-player |
| Developers | Evoluta Studio | Nianyi Wang |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more