Choose Mark of the Ninja
Choose Mark of the Ninja if it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 96.8% positive across 6,989 reviews.
Mark of the Ninja vs Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty
Mark of the Ninja and Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty both land in Action, Indie, Adventure on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Action, Indie, Adventure on Steam. Mark of the Ninja (2012) is 3 years older than Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty (2015). Mark of the Ninja scores higher on Steam reviews (96.8% positive) than Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty (83.8% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Which should you pick?
Choose Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty
Choose Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty if it's the newer release (2015) and ships with the modern feature baseline. 1,591 Steam reviews back the pick.
Both Mark of the Ninja and Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty sit in Action, Indie, and Adventure on Steam and both list Steam Leaderboards, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
Side-by-side comparison
 Mark of the Ninja |  Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2012 | 2015 |
| Genres | Action, Indie, Adventure | Action, Indie, Adventure |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Steam Deck | Deck Verified | Deck Playable |
| Price | Price unknown | 19.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 96.8% positive (6,989 reviews) | 83.8% positive (1,591 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Single-player only | Single-player only |
| Developers | Klei Entertainment | Just Add Water (Developments), Ltd. |
Side by side
- Both share Action, Indie, Adventure on Steam.
- Mark of the Ninja (2012) is 3 years older than Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty (2015).
- Mark of the Ninja scores higher on Steam reviews (96.8% positive) than Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty (83.8% positive).
- Steam Deck: Mark of the Ninja is Deck Verified, Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty is Deck Playable.
Mark of the Ninja vs Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty — FAQ
- Which is better, Mark of the Ninja or Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty?
- On Steam reviews Mark of the Ninja scores higher (96.8% positive) than Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty (83.8% positive). Both have enough reviews to trust the signal, so for players using reviews alone, Mark of the Ninja is the safer pick. Genre fit still matters — check the side-by-side table for the categories each game lands in.
- Should I play Mark of the Ninja or Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty first?
- If you want chronology, Mark of the Ninja (2012) came out before Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty (2015). If neither is a sequel to the other, order doesn't really matter — start with whichever fits your current mood, since both share enough on Steam to make either a reasonable opener.
- Are Mark of the Ninja and Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty similar?
- They overlap on Action, Indie, Adventure on Steam, so the catalogue groups them together — but "similar" depends on the specific mechanics. Use the genre + category rows above to decide whether the overlap matches what drew you to the one you've already played.