Choose Towns
Choose Towns if you want a RPG experience. On Steam, it's currently about 75% cheaper on the Steam Store. 2,076 Steam reviews back the pick.
Towns and Stonehearth both land in Strategy, Indie, Simulation on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Strategy, Indie, Simulation on Steam. Towns (2012) is 6 years older than Stonehearth (2018). Stonehearth scores higher on Steam reviews (72.1% positive) than Towns (25.6% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose Towns if you want a RPG experience. On Steam, it's currently about 75% cheaper on the Steam Store. 2,076 Steam reviews back the pick.
Choose Stonehearth if you want the Multi-player, Online PvP, and Shared/Split Screen PvP side of the pairing. On Steam, it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 72.1% positive across 5,812 reviews.
Both Towns and Stonehearth sit in Strategy, Indie, and Simulation on Steam, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
Towns | Stonehearth | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2012 | 2018 |
| Genres | Strategy, Indie, Simulation, RPG | Strategy, Indie, Simulation |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS |
| Steam Deck | Unrated | Deck Playable |
| Price | 4.99 USD | 19.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 25.6% positive (2,076 reviews) | 72.1% positive (5,812 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Single-player only | Multi-player, Online Co-op, Shared/Split Screen Co-op |
| Developers | Xavi Canal, Ben Palgi | Radiant Entertainment |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more