Choose Half-Life 2: Deathmatch
Choose Half-Life 2: Deathmatch if you want the Includes Source SDK side of the pairing. On Steam, it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 90.1% positive across 4,604 reviews.
Half-Life 2: Deathmatch and Half-Life Deathmatch: Source both land in Action on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both are Action games on Steam. Half-Life 2: Deathmatch (2004) is 2 years older than Half-Life Deathmatch: Source (2006). Half-Life 2: Deathmatch scores higher on Steam reviews (90.1% positive) than Half-Life Deathmatch: Source (75.3% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose Half-Life 2: Deathmatch if you want the Includes Source SDK side of the pairing. On Steam, it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 90.1% positive across 4,604 reviews.
Choose Half-Life Deathmatch: Source if you want the Camera Comfort side of the pairing. 1,976 Steam reviews back the pick.
Both Half-Life 2: Deathmatch and Half-Life Deathmatch: Source sit in Action on Steam and both list Multi-player, Custom Volume Controls, and Stereo Sound, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
Half-Life 2: Deathmatch | Half-Life Deathmatch: Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Genres | Action | Action |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Windows, Linux |
| Steam Deck | Deck Playable | Deck Playable |
| Price | Price unknown | 9.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 90.1% positive (4,604 reviews) | 75.3% positive (1,976 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Multi-player | Multi-player |
| Developers | Valve | Valve |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more