Choose SquareCells
Choose SquareCells if it's currently about 39% cheaper on the Steam Store. SquareCells launched in 2015.
SquareCells and Pictopix both land in Indie, Casual on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Indie, Casual on Steam. SquareCells (2015) is 2 years older than Pictopix (2017). Pictopix scores higher on Steam reviews (97.3% positive) than SquareCells (89.5% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose SquareCells if it's currently about 39% cheaper on the Steam Store. SquareCells launched in 2015.
Choose Pictopix if you want a Strategy game with Steam Leaderboards. On Steam, it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 97.3% positive across 1,012 reviews.
Both SquareCells and Pictopix sit in Indie and Casual on Steam, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
SquareCells | Pictopix | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Genres | Indie, Casual | Strategy, Indie, Casual |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Steam Deck | Deck Playable | Deck Playable |
| Price | 2.99 USD | 4.89 USD |
| Steam reviews | 89.5% positive (762 reviews) | 97.3% positive (1,012 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Single-player only | Single-player only |
| Developers | Matthew Brown | Tomlab Games |