Choose Blood and Bacon
Choose Blood and Bacon if you want an Adventure and Casual experience. On Steam, it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 96.1% positive across 13,126 reviews.
Blood and Bacon vs Masked Forces: Zombie Survival
Blood and Bacon and Masked Forces: Zombie Survival both land in Action on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both are Action games on Steam. Blood and Bacon (2016) is 1 year older than Masked Forces: Zombie Survival (2017). Blood and Bacon scores higher on Steam reviews (96.1% positive) than Masked Forces: Zombie Survival (74.1% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Which should you pick?
Choose Masked Forces: Zombie Survival
Choose Masked Forces: Zombie Survival if you want an Indie experience. On Steam, it's currently about 51% cheaper on the Steam Store. Masked Forces: Zombie Survival launched in 2017.
Both Blood and Bacon and Masked Forces: Zombie Survival sit in Action on Steam and both list Multi-player, Steam Leaderboards, and Online PvP, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
Side-by-side comparison
 Blood and Bacon |  Masked Forces: Zombie Survival | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2016 | 2017 |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Casual | Action, Indie |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Deck Unsupported | Unrated |
| Price | 0.99 USD | 0.49 USD |
| Steam reviews | 96.1% positive (13,126 reviews) | 74.1% positive (174 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Multi-player, Online Co-op, Co-op | Multi-player, Online Co-op, Co-op |
| Developers | Big Corporation | Nightbinder |
Side by side
- Both are Action games on Steam.
- Blood and Bacon (2016) is 1 year older than Masked Forces: Zombie Survival (2017).
- Blood and Bacon scores higher on Steam reviews (96.1% positive) than Masked Forces: Zombie Survival (74.1% positive).
- Masked Forces: Zombie Survival is currently ~51% cheaper on Steam than Blood and Bacon (0.49 USD vs. 0.99 USD).
- Both support cooperative play.
- Blood and Bacon is Deck Unsupported on Steam Deck; Masked Forces: Zombie Survival has no Deck rating yet.
Blood and Bacon vs Masked Forces: Zombie Survival — FAQ
- Which is better, Blood and Bacon or Masked Forces: Zombie Survival?
- On Steam reviews Blood and Bacon scores higher (96.1% positive) than Masked Forces: Zombie Survival (74.1% positive). Both have enough reviews to trust the signal, so for players using reviews alone, Blood and Bacon is the safer pick. Genre fit still matters — check the side-by-side table for the categories each game lands in.
- Should I play Blood and Bacon or Masked Forces: Zombie Survival first?
- If you want chronology, Blood and Bacon (2016) came out before Masked Forces: Zombie Survival (2017). If neither is a sequel to the other, order doesn't really matter — start with whichever fits your current mood, since both share enough on Steam to make either a reasonable opener.
- Are Blood and Bacon and Masked Forces: Zombie Survival similar?
- They overlap on Action on Steam, so the catalogue groups them together — but "similar" depends on the specific mechanics. Use the genre + category rows above to decide whether the overlap matches what drew you to the one you've already played.
- Do both Blood and Bacon and Masked Forces: Zombie Survival have co-op?
- Yes — both list a co-op category on Steam. Specifics differ: Blood and Bacon ships Online Co-op, Co-op; Masked Forces: Zombie Survival ships Online Co-op, Co-op.