Choose March of the Living
Choose March of the Living if you want a Strategy experience. March of the Living launched in 2016.
March of the Living and Running on Empty both land in Indie, Adventure on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both share Indie, Adventure on Steam. March of the Living (2016) is 6 years older than Running on Empty (2022). Running on Empty scores higher on Steam reviews (100% positive) than March of the Living (69.7% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose March of the Living if you want a Strategy experience. March of the Living launched in 2016.
Choose Running on Empty if you want a Simulation, RPG, and Casual game with Steam Leaderboards. On Steam, it's currently about 73% cheaper on the Steam Store. Running on Empty launched in 2022.
Both March of the Living and Running on Empty sit in Indie and Adventure on Steam, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
March of the Living | Running on Empty | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2016 | 2022 |
| Genres | Strategy, Indie, Adventure | Indie, Adventure, Simulation, RPG, Casual |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Deck Playable | Unrated |
| Price | 14.99 USD | 3.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 69.7% positive (347 reviews) | 100% positive (18 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Single-player only | Single-player only |
| Developers | Machine 22 | T.F.A.N.C.S. |
We use one local identifier for anonymous usage stats — no ads, no tracking. Learn more