Choose STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005)
Choose STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) if it matches what drew you to this matchup. 34,695 Steam reviews back the pick.
STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) vs STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004)
STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) and STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) both land in Action on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both are Action games on Steam. STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) (2009) is 10 years older than STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) (2019). STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) scores higher on Steam reviews (96.6% positive) than STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) (94.9% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Which should you pick?
Choose STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004)
Choose STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) if it's the newer release (2019) and ships with the modern feature baseline. 2,839 Steam reviews back the pick.
Both STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) and STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) sit in Action on Steam and both list Multi-player, Online PvP, and PvP, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Steam reviews are nearly tied (94.9% vs 96.6% positive), so genre fit is the cleanest tiebreaker — scroll the table for the feature-by-feature view.
Side-by-side comparison
 STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) |  STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2009 | 2019 |
| Genres | Action | Action |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Deck Playable | Deck Playable |
| Price | 2.49 USD | 2.49 USD |
| Steam reviews | 94.9% positive (34,695 reviews) | 96.6% positive (2,839 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Multi-player | Multi-player, Cross-Platform Multiplayer |
| Developers | Pandemic Studios | Pandemic Studios |
Side by side
- Both are Action games on Steam.
- STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) (2009) is 10 years older than STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) (2019).
- STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) scores higher on Steam reviews (96.6% positive) than STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) (94.9% positive).
- STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) is currently ~0% cheaper on Steam than STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) (2.49 USD vs. 2.49 USD).
- Both are Deck Playable.
STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) vs STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) — FAQ
- Which is better, STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) or STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004)?
- On Steam reviews the two are nearly tied: STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) sits at 94.9% positive (34,695 reviews), STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) at 96.6% (2,839). The choice usually comes down to genre fit and the platform features each one supports — see the comparison table above.
- Should I play STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) or STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) first?
- If you want chronology, STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) (2009) came out before STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) (2019). If neither is a sequel to the other, order doesn't really matter — start with whichever fits your current mood, since both share enough on Steam to make either a reasonable opener.
- Are STAR WARS™ Battlefront II (Classic, 2005) and STAR WARS™ Battlefront (Classic, 2004) similar?
- They overlap on Action on Steam, so the catalogue groups them together — but "similar" depends on the specific mechanics. Use the genre + category rows above to decide whether the overlap matches what drew you to the one you've already played.