Choose CrossCells
Choose CrossCells if you want a Strategy and Casual experience. On Steam, it's currently about 40% cheaper on the Steam Store. CrossCells launched in 2017.
CrossCells and Cypher both land in Indie on Steam, which is why they keep getting compared. The comparison below is built from each game's Steam metadata — release year, genres, categories, Steam Deck status, price, and review score — refreshed daily by imho.run's scraper. Headline differences: Both are Indie games on Steam. CrossCells (2017) is 1 year older than Cypher (2018). Cypher scores higher on Steam reviews (88.8% positive) than CrossCells (84% positive). No login or purchase needed — scroll for the full table, the verdict FAQ, and links to ranked similar games for both titles.
Choose CrossCells if you want a Strategy and Casual experience. On Steam, it's currently about 40% cheaper on the Steam Store. CrossCells launched in 2017.
Choose Cypher if it carries the stronger Steam consensus at 88.8% positive across 383 reviews.
Both CrossCells and Cypher sit in Indie on Steam, so either pick lands in the same broad neighborhood. Use the side-by-side table for the feature view, or follow the "Games like" links below to see ranked alternatives for either title.
CrossCells | Cypher | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2017 | 2018 |
| Genres | Strategy, Indie, Casual | Indie |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
| Steam Deck | Deck Playable | Deck Playable |
| Price | 2.99 USD | 4.99 USD |
| Steam reviews | 84% positive (544 reviews) | 88.8% positive (383 reviews) |
| Multiplayer | Single-player only | Single-player only |
| Developers | Matthew Brown | Matthew Brown |